<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pete Carr's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petecarr.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog</link>
	<description>Things that I do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Photoshop CS5 and HDR by Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2010/05/05/photoshop-cs5-and-hdr/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=182#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Its just Lightroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its just Lightroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photoshop CS5 and HDR by Jimmy_Lemon</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2010/05/05/photoshop-cs5-and-hdr/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy_Lemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=182#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Is that last shot just processed in Lightroom? or Photomatix then Lightroom? - as for the rest of it I have to agree, I have tried a few different images and played around with the settings and really struggled to get anything remotely pleasing :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that last shot just processed in Lightroom? or Photomatix then Lightroom? &#8211; as for the rest of it I have to agree, I have tried a few different images and played around with the settings and really struggled to get anything remotely pleasing <img src='http://www.petecarr.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liverpool Photowalk by Vanilla Days : Samba Carnival in Liverpool</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2009/08/03/liverpool-photowalk/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanilla Days : Samba Carnival in Liverpool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=123#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] other news I&#8217;ve blogged about the photowalk that took place the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other news I&#8217;ve blogged about the photowalk that took place the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack in da box by Tami</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2009/04/13/jack-in-da-box/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=107#comment-270</guid>
		<description>These are awesome. The one i find most successful it the one where he is carrying the box...excellent composition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are awesome. The one i find most successful it the one where he is carrying the box&#8230;excellent composition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future proofing photojournalism by ivan wentland</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2010/02/05/future-proofing-photojournalism/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan wentland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=172#comment-203</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mean for this to sound mean or negative to anyone.
However, it seems that &quot;amateurs talk about gear and professionals talk about light&quot;. Not that you can&#039;t talk about gear or cameras I just think you get to a point that you have a vision and the rest is really just the lighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean for this to sound mean or negative to anyone.<br />
However, it seems that &#8220;amateurs talk about gear and professionals talk about light&#8221;. Not that you can&#8217;t talk about gear or cameras I just think you get to a point that you have a vision and the rest is really just the lighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future proofing photojournalism by Mark McNulty</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2010/02/05/future-proofing-photojournalism/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McNulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=172#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I can see where you&#039;re coming from on this one only I don&#039;t think we should be comparing 5mp Nokia phones with John Thomson&#039;s plate glass work.  Whilst some news reporters may be carrying phones that take photos for grab shots to go online and even at times in the papers themselves, this is only an indication of the way things are going in the newspaper industry.  Paper sales are on the way out to some extent, and from an environmental point of view that&#039;s not a bad thing, but I don&#039;t think we should be looking at newspapers to be the saviours of our visual history.  And for the most part, the majority of newspapers whether on or offline will carry on using pro photographers with pro gear because most photographs need to hold a narrative which a member of the public with a mobile phone is not going to achieve.

Personally, I shoot on everything from phones to 12mp slrs with a large archive of film. The film is constantly being scanned and both the scans and current digital work are often backed up via numerous drives and discs to make sure that they are there, should anybody be interested, in the future.  At the same time, all over the world, people are doing the same. They store low res on the internet on various websites, and some even store high up there, and all kinds of sizes are backed up in many ways offline.  With regards to pioneers like John Thomson, how many more like him had their glass plates smashed or lost or degraded in the last 100+ years? If it had been digital, and backed up, I think we would get to see even more of history so I&#039;m not too worried about our present being preserved for future generations. i think it&#039;s doing ok as it is.

Aside from that there are still people today who work like John Thomson. Have you seen Simon Norfolk&#039;s photographs of Afghanistan which he took on a massive big wooden camera? And I&#039;m sure there are plenty more who still wander the world, with quality gear, documenting lands and people and events because that&#039;s what they want to do or feel they have to do.  And I think that will always carry on.  And what do we lose if a few journalist&#039;s mobile photos of Cheryl Cole won&#039;t blow up to a metre high print in 2150?  

Anyway, you&#039;re only using it as an excuse to yourself for wanting to buy a Leica! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see where you&#8217;re coming from on this one only I don&#8217;t think we should be comparing 5mp Nokia phones with John Thomson&#8217;s plate glass work.  Whilst some news reporters may be carrying phones that take photos for grab shots to go online and even at times in the papers themselves, this is only an indication of the way things are going in the newspaper industry.  Paper sales are on the way out to some extent, and from an environmental point of view that&#8217;s not a bad thing, but I don&#8217;t think we should be looking at newspapers to be the saviours of our visual history.  And for the most part, the majority of newspapers whether on or offline will carry on using pro photographers with pro gear because most photographs need to hold a narrative which a member of the public with a mobile phone is not going to achieve.</p>
<p>Personally, I shoot on everything from phones to 12mp slrs with a large archive of film. The film is constantly being scanned and both the scans and current digital work are often backed up via numerous drives and discs to make sure that they are there, should anybody be interested, in the future.  At the same time, all over the world, people are doing the same. They store low res on the internet on various websites, and some even store high up there, and all kinds of sizes are backed up in many ways offline.  With regards to pioneers like John Thomson, how many more like him had their glass plates smashed or lost or degraded in the last 100+ years? If it had been digital, and backed up, I think we would get to see even more of history so I&#8217;m not too worried about our present being preserved for future generations. i think it&#8217;s doing ok as it is.</p>
<p>Aside from that there are still people today who work like John Thomson. Have you seen Simon Norfolk&#8217;s photographs of Afghanistan which he took on a massive big wooden camera? And I&#8217;m sure there are plenty more who still wander the world, with quality gear, documenting lands and people and events because that&#8217;s what they want to do or feel they have to do.  And I think that will always carry on.  And what do we lose if a few journalist&#8217;s mobile photos of Cheryl Cole won&#8217;t blow up to a metre high print in 2150?  </p>
<p>Anyway, you&#8217;re only using it as an excuse to yourself for wanting to buy a Leica! <img src='http://www.petecarr.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s my head at? by G</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2009/11/28/wheres-my-head-at/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=165#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Strange though it may seem, you should cherish the fact that you worry about this, because so many in the people in the world have no idea what it&#039;s like to have that need to create something. That need for artistry and output. Most people don&#039;t know what it&#039;s like to have a head bursting with ideas which need crystallisation, whether it&#039;s in paint, in words, in a photograph.

Every other person I meet claims to be a budding photographer, many of them buy an expensive camera, some even take some photos. But almost none of them have that need to. Almost none of them have that burning thing inside which you have - that which makes you stress out about not creating the images you want to create, and worrying about what stops you. It&#039;s the side-effect of creative genius.

As for your fears - it&#039;s never about overcoming them - because that suggests they&#039;ll go away when you get your head straight - it&#039;s about overriding them with stronger emotions. If, at the moment you want to press the button, all you can feel is the fear of the situation and the anxiety of that moment, then you can&#039;t move forward.

You&#039;ll probably never lose that feeling which rises up and wants to block you the moment you want to act on the impulse, but you have to drown it in the feeling of success you&#039;ll have from taking the shot. The retrospective pleasure you&#039;ll have for years to come on the picture you take, just as you have with those stunning images above.

Instead of beating yourself up about it afterwards, you need to learn to beat yourself up at the time. In that instant when you need to make a decision to take a photograph, and every fibre of your being is making you chicken out, you need to jump forward in time to tomorrow and think about how annoyed you&#039;ll be that you didn&#039;t bother. 
 
You have to harness that feeling of regret from the future, and tell yourself not to live a life of missed opportunity. There are far, far harder things in life than taking a photograph, and far, far more risky things to do. You&#039;ll feel fantastic afterwards, and you&#039;ll be able to use that to make the next photo ever so slightly easier.

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange though it may seem, you should cherish the fact that you worry about this, because so many in the people in the world have no idea what it&#8217;s like to have that need to create something. That need for artistry and output. Most people don&#8217;t know what it&#8217;s like to have a head bursting with ideas which need crystallisation, whether it&#8217;s in paint, in words, in a photograph.</p>
<p>Every other person I meet claims to be a budding photographer, many of them buy an expensive camera, some even take some photos. But almost none of them have that need to. Almost none of them have that burning thing inside which you have &#8211; that which makes you stress out about not creating the images you want to create, and worrying about what stops you. It&#8217;s the side-effect of creative genius.</p>
<p>As for your fears &#8211; it&#8217;s never about overcoming them &#8211; because that suggests they&#8217;ll go away when you get your head straight &#8211; it&#8217;s about overriding them with stronger emotions. If, at the moment you want to press the button, all you can feel is the fear of the situation and the anxiety of that moment, then you can&#8217;t move forward.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll probably never lose that feeling which rises up and wants to block you the moment you want to act on the impulse, but you have to drown it in the feeling of success you&#8217;ll have from taking the shot. The retrospective pleasure you&#8217;ll have for years to come on the picture you take, just as you have with those stunning images above.</p>
<p>Instead of beating yourself up about it afterwards, you need to learn to beat yourself up at the time. In that instant when you need to make a decision to take a photograph, and every fibre of your being is making you chicken out, you need to jump forward in time to tomorrow and think about how annoyed you&#8217;ll be that you didn&#8217;t bother. </p>
<p>You have to harness that feeling of regret from the future, and tell yourself not to live a life of missed opportunity. There are far, far harder things in life than taking a photograph, and far, far more risky things to do. You&#8217;ll feel fantastic afterwards, and you&#8217;ll be able to use that to make the next photo ever so slightly easier.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s my head at? by Adam Bestwick</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2009/11/28/wheres-my-head-at/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bestwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=165#comment-198</guid>
		<description>To use a sports analogy, form is temporary - class is permanent. 
You may feel you&#039;re treading familiar territory photographically, but, as far as I can see, you&#039;re still doing great things.
I enjoy all of your shots, and find them engaging and interesting, and as Iain says above, maybe you need to surround yourself with new people and environments and see what happens!
ATB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To use a sports analogy, form is temporary &#8211; class is permanent.<br />
You may feel you&#8217;re treading familiar territory photographically, but, as far as I can see, you&#8217;re still doing great things.<br />
I enjoy all of your shots, and find them engaging and interesting, and as Iain says above, maybe you need to surround yourself with new people and environments and see what happens!<br />
ATB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack in da box by singapore photography services</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2009/04/13/jack-in-da-box/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>singapore photography services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=107#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Beautiful pictures of your nephew! Candid and gorgeous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful pictures of your nephew! Candid and gorgeous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s my head at? by Vanilla Days : Best of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.petecarr.net/blog/2009/11/28/wheres-my-head-at/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanilla Days : Best of 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petecarr.net/blog/?p=165#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone was taking the same 50mm f/1.8 Xmas shots in town. It had all become over-saturated and I felt lost. I have been working on a project with Fab but I&#8217;ve been feeling a bit depressed about that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone was taking the same 50mm f/1.8 Xmas shots in town. It had all become over-saturated and I felt lost. I have been working on a project with Fab but I&#8217;ve been feeling a bit depressed about that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
